Now that Obama's record is indisputable, lesser-evilism is all the Dems have left.
Their LOTE theories all assume the worst about Romney and the best about Obama, hinging on the idea that Romney will be totally evil and unstoppable, while Obama, free of the burden of reelection, will do good things.
Personally, I agree with Glen Ford of BAR. Obama is the more effective evil.
If I was someone who bought into the concept of lesser-evilism, I'd have to rate Romney the lesser based on the notion that the Dems will resist him for partisan gain if nothing else.
But LOTE be damned. I'll be voting third party as I usually do. It feels just fine voting on principle rather than trying to imagine which side of the duopoly is going to accidentally screw me less.
Order an AE T-shirt, now in stock! Union-made, 100% cotton white shirt. $25+s/h. US orders only. Look great, support my blogging, and have interesting discussions with the TSA!
2 Comments:
Now that Obama's record is indisputable, lesser-evilism is all the Dems have left.
Their LOTE theories all assume the worst about Romney and the best about Obama, hinging on the idea that Romney will be totally evil and unstoppable, while Obama, free of the burden of reelection, will do good things.
Personally, I agree with Glen Ford of BAR. Obama is the more effective evil.
If I was someone who bought into the concept of lesser-evilism, I'd have to rate Romney the lesser based on the notion that the Dems will resist him for partisan gain if nothing else.
But LOTE be damned. I'll be voting third party as I usually do. It feels just fine voting on principle rather than trying to imagine which side of the duopoly is going to accidentally screw me less.
Ha, classic!
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home